Family structure Essay

Abstract end-to-end the take to the woods of history and from the duration that human cosmoss began to pass and grow into civilizations, the beliefs of what was thought normal, the distinct ways of animated fand so forth greatly changed over time. One legitimate belief that is focused in this paper is family mental synthesis, the production line in that location is between atomic families and the wide peerless(a)s. Although the unify States has at once a dominant twist, which is thermo thermonu create families, it wasnt ever to a greater extent like this. It alone has m some(prenominal) an(prenominal) distinguish fitted norms of family building receivable to differences in socio sparing status, the government, pietism, media, assimilation, etc. more thanover, do an separate(prenominal)(prenominal) countries. One must echo how these fonts of influences as puff up as play a key employment in other(a) move of the world, for example the Latin-Ameri bath countries whose main structure is extensive families. This paper entrust focus on family structure in join States but Latin the States as salubrious. How has family structure changed over time in the unify States? How has family structure changed in Latin the States? How do these 2 distinguishable parts of the world, differ from each other and how do they compargon in terms of family structure and what influences them? Finally, where might the future of family structure be headed towards, in two of these regions of the world?Keywords Family anatomical structure U.S, Family Structure Latin AmericaModernized Family Structure in the get together States and Latin AmericaFamily structure is a design that has changed over time. As complex as it is, it move take over a variety of structures, or forms. in that location isnt a hotshot interpretation for this term, as in on that point is non only one unique model of family, theres no stereotype for it. As know families and the changes within them, ar different from earth to country and close to the world, this is due to the fact that theres different customs, values, morals, cultures and traditions, commandment, marri suppu judge, fertility rate rates, rescue different industrialisation levels among those countries, etc. However, the to a greater extent(prenominal) outstanding change has occurred between nuclear families and lengthened families, because those atomic bit 18 the dickens main family structures, and the ones who seem to be ever-changing in this novel world.The previous distinguish facts winthe reasons wherefore this is happening and withal how can it become in the future if it continues this way. The coupled States is a great example of new-fangledization and these changes in family, because it went from a large issue of elongated families to an increasing get of nuclear families. On the other hand, there ar the Latin American countries, that change surface though th ey energize likewise modernized, they windlessness oblige more than drawn-out families due to culture, traditions or education reasons. Using as an example this two different regions, which be whole different economic and culture wise. It volition be easier to interpretation differences and similarities that Latin America has undergone comp ared to the united States of America over time and why it is this way.Types of StructuresFamily is a societal institution that unites commonwealth to cooperate with one another(prenominal) in groups, with the purpose of taking care of each one in the group. in that respectfore, there is not a specific model for what a family should look like. There are different types and ways of families living in phratrys all nigh the world. For example One-parent families, composed by single mother or father families with couples that arent married, Blended families singlehood, single individual plurality, adoptive families, single chelas, etc. However, the two predominant types that corroborate evolved over time and employment with each other, those are drawn-out and the nuclear families.The atomic family similarly known as conjugal family is a family composed of the two spouses and their children, ground on marriage. The Extended family is composed of parents and children as well as other kin this macrocosm grandparents, uncles, cousins, etc. This group is also called consanguine family, because everyone shares blood type. Nuclear families are often seen in industrialized societies, epoch elongated families prevail in preindustrial societies. United States Family Structure BackgroundThe United States of America it is now a industrialized high income country that has fully veritable and in which many submit seek to reach citizen ship, due to the nonetheless of climbing the socioeconomic flow or class mobility and also that there is that ease to economically support and provide for families in berth o f the opportunity there are. because again, it wasnt alwayslike this, providence and the U.S. wasnt as true in the beginning, and many matters were different. Analyzing it from the familys structure point of view, it historically went from being mainly panoptic families to nuclear. As it is known the United States, has been colonized by European countries more specifically England. Then it is no surprise to the highest degree of its trends, cultural traits, traditions, etc. comes from Europe.Moreover, they brought education. This was why in the time during the colonization form 1600 to 1700s, the United States was mainly ground in agriculture and faming, therefore they necessary of many members to help take care of lands and help with children. They were also really numerous families because lack of education. So quite a little used to have a large number of children, because they werent taught how to avoid that, and because they thought the more children they had the sof ten. precisely this went changing. Moving on to the time of the industrial variety in the 1800s, there was an economic impulse, and now that people where more better and started develop individually, made nuclear families grow.As a result of this situation, the number of extended families went down however the household population was still 90% extended families. The remaining 10%, who were largely the ones with extended recourses, rich or monied as mention before, were the ones able to educate themselves, develop economy and therefore, have less children because of ease it represented. On the course of time, round the early(a) 19th century, there was more or less a 1% increase in extended families due the fact that during 60s and the 70s there was a harder economy, so family was mandatory to help with economy.Regardless of this fact the multigenerational families were still in decay. Furthermore, numbers clearly show this decrease. Parents and children living with other re latives have gone from 65.5% in 1940 to 46.2% in 1970. similarly according to N. V. Benokraitis (2010), Two generations ago, the typical American family consisted of a father, a mother, and deuce-ace or four children (p. 03). These facts show how from the time of the colonies, the industrialization to the time of the 1900s, larger families have lessened. United States in the PresentGoing shape up to the end of the 1900s into 20th Century people started to see more and more changes in family households. In the U.S. it started to emerge the less dominant divers types of family structures, making its wayto even more developed country. The nuclear family is for now the predominant one cause the economy and the culture has set it as the ideal for the clock the U.S. is going through. Although, and as mentioned before these minority family types are in erosion. In the United States these changes occurred because of cause and nucleus reactions. The three main causes are modernization, economy, and license.For example, marriages, they are no longer what they used to be. Due to, conflicts that cause divorces and not to mention, the seeking of emancipation among men and women specially. Bianchi & Spain, (1996) argued that U.S. families are changing in response to a number of factors, including the go for of women to have more career options ant to provide better feels for their children Bianchi & Spain, 1996, p. 6-8, (as cited in Macionis, 2010, p.368). Also, Browns (1981) studies piece the following compare the urban and rural parts of the country, between 1950 and 1970, showed that rural divorce were lower, fewer women age 20-24 were unmarried, and the number of children per 1,000 ever married women age 35-44 was meagrely higher in rural America. This shows how men and women that live in urban position, tend get more divorces or be single, than those in rural start where it tends to be more of a family environment. As a matter of fact the individual grow th and independence is also reflecting in unsalted adults, as well as adult. Almost 19 cardinal adults around ages 30 to 44 are single and have never been married, representing 31 percent of all people in that age group, this is happening because it is more economic to only look after themselves, rather than for a whole family. For example in the U.S. out of 117.2 million households, 78.9 million (67%) meet the bureaus definition of family.The rest of the living units contained single people or not relates, and in 1950, 90% of household where families (U.S. nose count Bureau, 2010). Despite, that family health is decreasing it is fact that these single people are more capable of maintaining their finance, and paying debts. Blended and one parent household have also rise this past years. Trends in culture and modern life, have led people into be more and more unsatisfied with the people they marry. The demands are higher and conflict among spouses get sometimes into violence, abu se, etc. and as a result people get divorces, get remarried or stay single parents.Forexample from 2007 to 2008 the census date that the percentage of children under age 18 living with two married parents fell from 77 percent in 1980 to 67 percent. In addition, Single-parent American households change magnitude from 11 percent of all households in 1970 to 29 percent. Al this, has led to this last few years, the present day in the United States. In which nuclear families are the ideal and majority, although this is evidently changing and also a place where, families are no longer multigenerational, and if there are still some left, they will eventually disappear. In other words, it is a man that family is metaphoricalally falling apart, in the United States. Latin Americas family backgroundmany aspects of Latin American history compared to the United States are the equal, however the difference lays on the way thing where approached. In Latin American countries history, it is evi dent that the extended families were more of a tradition in the culture before colonies, in which indigenous or inherent people lived in group and large families protect each other, similar to the movie Pocahontas. Indigenous didnt have any education, another reason for why they had larger families. Subsequently, around the 1400s Christopher Columbus and European missioner, begun colonizing Latin American countries. During this process a rising race was formed, the mixed race, which was a result of, the European missioners mixed with the indigenous.Europeans provided the native and mixed races with little if any education and strongly imposed and established their culture, devotion and government trends. For more than three centuries, from 1492 until the end of the rebellions for independence in 1826, European powers ruled Colonial Latin America. Spain and Portugal dominated the majority of Latin America. After that stop every Latin American country had its independence. Then aga in, they still kept the culture and the Catholic religion as well the multigenerational family type of European countries. This remained often steady for an extended period of time until the early 19th century, were the time for modernization and industrialization in Latin America started. However, until that time a ripping of extended families occurred.This meaning that extended families divided into two the poor extended families, that where the indigenous families, that because of lack of education had numerous children, and because their poverty the entirekinship had to hand in the same household, not being able to afford land or properties. On the other hand, there was the wealth extended family that was the black-and-blue European people and the mixed race successors who were accepted by their European parents being raced as white and educated at the same level as the white who stayed in Latin America. This side of the extended families, which were wealth and well educated, where the ones who lived in multigenerational family structure due to largely tradition, and as a sign of well being and success. Further on, in the 1900s, like stated before modernization process incremented and then the gap among this family type widened. Leading one into successfully adapt to modern way of living and the other, into a greater poverty. Latin America in Present DaySince The 90s Latin America started to follow the passage into a modern society. Even thought southward American countries dont have the industrialization level as the U.S., opportunity and economy has also risen. Therefore, Family change also occurred. Basically in Latin America has now divided its family structure into three parts and for distinct reasons. The first one is the wealthy extended families, which live in larger families on the dot because of tradition or culture, for example as Macionis (2010) states many a(prenominal) Latinos enjoy the loyalty and support of extended families. Traditi onally, Latino parents exercise greater control over childrens courtship, considering marriage an alliance of families (p. 378). It is basically to have a better control and help with raising of the children. assist there are the wealthy nuclear families, which have followed more North American trends.Finally there is the poor extended family, which live in larger families due to lack of education, and also because help is needed with the raising of children. Even though the economy and the breeding in South America is not even close the first world countries it still evolved simmer down fast into modernized life, with higher numbers of nuclear family. As a matter of fact, extended families are starting to decrease. It went being the majority in developing countries of Latin American two decades ago, to being now in present day around a quarter of the population in every Latin American country. According to the ECLAC (The Economic Commission for Latin America), around 43% of the entire population of Latin America is in poverty or below, and 40% of poor people live in extended family household.Whichmeans its only a 17.2 percent, the number of extended families in present day. A better quality education during the past three decades, has been another factor that impulse Latin American young adults and adults from ages around 25 30 f to retain decisions in whether they want fewer or more member of their family, living in a harder, more competitive, and modern world. The tradition of large families helped Latinos to be largest minority groups in the U.S., however, today more and more Latinas are making the same decision, and opting to have fewer children. (Navarro, 2004 U.S. census Bureau, 2008).In terms of the other family types has also changed, although it is not a noticeable, some of types as single child families, and adoptive families, have been becoming more oft seen in Latin-American societies. Although, individualization or singlehood for example, is not that common in Latin American, because for one, in Hispanic countries is not well seen when a person around it late twenties early thirties does not have a partner or spouse. Comparing the United States and Latin-AmericaBoth backgrounds are mostly the same because twain regions had the same lack of education and both where colonized by European countries, although this may be true, things in family structure turned out different because of the socio-economical and development approach they had. Comparing both regions, they both underwent that family structural change, and had almost the same results they both adapted modern family structures. However, the change of the U.S is higher in rates and percentage, because as showed by the research Latin Americans still keep some of their traditions, and extended families either being poor or wealthy. Whereas the United States has industrialized and socio-economy developed that the extended families are cut to a small fraction, m oreover, nuclear families have also reduced. Concluding ResearchIn conclusion of this research, it is clear that in the United States family structure went drastically from being multigenerational or extended, to nuclear, and is turning into independent structure, as an performance of mainly modernization, and practical living. Following the same path, it is Latin-America, whose selective information shows that family structure has also suffered andevolved into more nuclear and modern families.But unlike the United States, it still maintain some part of its traditions, culture, and extended family structure, generally speaking, it still in the transition from extended to nuclear family. As a result, of still being several stairs behind the industrialization level of the U.S. Nonetheless, all country will get to the same point and this metaphoric conflict there is among nuclear and extended families around the globe, will further on be nonexistent, because there will be a majority of independent people, trying to succeed and survive in a competitive world, where therell be no place and time for family.ReferencesBenokraitis, N. V. (2010). The changing family. labor unions and Families Changes, Choices and Constraints (pp. 03 25). New York, NY Pearson Education. Berroa, R. (1986). An introduction to Latin American society a background to its fiction. literature of the Americas. vol. 1. Retrieved from http//mason.gmu.edu/rberroa/Latinamerica.htm The Economic Commission for Latin America. (2011a.). Types of urban households,by household per capita income level, 2010. XLS. file. Retrieved from http//websie.eclac.cl/anuario_estadistico/anuario_2011/esp/content_es.asp The Economic Commission for Latin America. (2011b.). silly and indigent population,urban and rural areas. XLS. file. Retrieved from http//websie.eclac.cl/anuario_estadistico/anuario_2011/esp/content_es.asp Farrell, B., VandeVusse, A., & Ocobock, A. (2012). Family change and the state of sociology. Current Sociology, 60(3), 283-301.doi10.1177/0011392111425599. Kobrin, F. E. (1976). The fall in household size and the rise of the primary individual in the United States. Population of Studies and Training Center, vol. 13(1), 1-17 Larkin, M. (1966). Family planning in Mexico. Nation, 203(16), 508-511. Macionis, J. J. (2010). Family and religion. association The Basics (pp. 366 383). NewYork, NY Pearson Education, Inc. Mogey, J. (1962). Changes in the family Introduction. International Social accomplishment Journal, 14(3), 411-424. Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. M. (1996). Racial differences in nonmarital births. Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women. (pp. 6 8). New York, NY Russell Sage Foundation The United States Census. (2010). Americas Families andLiving Arrangements 2012. Retrieved from http//www.huduser.org/Datasets/IL/IL08/in_fy2008.pdf The United States Census. (2010). Census Bureau Reports Foreign-Born Households are Larger, Include More Children and Gr andparents 2012 Retrieved from http//www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/foreignborn_population/cb12-79.html Zimmerman, C. C. (1972). The future of the family in america. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34(2), 323-333.